Showing posts with label canal path. Show all posts
Showing posts with label canal path. Show all posts

Sunday, 4 December 2016

Bridgewater Way Ice Update

It seems my various emails to TfGM and others about the ice on the Bridgewater Way payed off.

By the time it had warmed up enough for me to use the route again on the Friday there were clear signs that an extensive salting had been carried out.





In the exchange of emails that went round I was given the following contact information for the maintenance of the Bridgewater Way:-

By email to - Bridgewatercanal@peel.co.uk

Telephone - 0161 629 8200 between 2pm and 4pm Monday to Friday.

Emergency Telephone - out of office hours 0161 877 3628

Please note only emergency calls will be dealt with on this number.

Write to - The Bridgewater Canal Company Limited, Peel Dome, intu Trafford Centre, TRaffordCITY Manchester M17 8PL, UK

Though I would copy any emails to TfGM's cycling team, so they know what's going on...

Tuesday, 29 November 2016

Bridgewater Way Ice Danger

This morning clearly illustrated that if you don't maintain a cycle route you are creating danger.

The Bridgewater Way coming out of Castlefield was covered in sheet ice. Anyone hitting this ice on a bicycle could easilly have ended up in the canal, in water that was freezing over, a lethal combination.









Let's just hope that TfGM take this seriously and sort this out. The are promoting cycling in winter but their routes are clearly not fit for purpose. I won't be using this route until temperatures rise above freezing.

Monday, 31 August 2015

Speed bumps, locked gates, loose chippings and new dismount signs - Making cycling inconvenient on the Ashton Canal

When I walked along the Ashton Canal back in April the resurfacing was still underway. Progress was promising, with a good quality tarmac surface being laid, though the work did seem to be rather slow. This route is part of the Velocity plans, so the money has come from cycling budgets.



Four months later and the final touches are mostly done.

Final touches designed to make cycling uncomfortable, noisy, dangerous and inconvenient.

Speed bumps

Yes, speed bumps!

So, you put down a decent tarmac surface, then ruin it with these cobbled bumps. There are scores of them all along the path. Total waste of money, money that's supposed to encourage cycling not discourage it.



Locked Gates

Yes, gates which have been open are now locked.

This was last year...



and now. Try getting a bike and child trailer through this - impossible without lifting it over. Remember this is a Velocity route that is supposed to encourage cycling not discourage it.



Loose Chippings

Remember that lovely smooth tarmac surface in the first photo?

Well forget it!

Almost the entire route has been covered in a thick layer of loose chippings. This makes progress along the path slow and noisy, and if that dog runs out in-front of you your brakes will simply lock up so don't bother with the front brake if you want to remain upright.



and then there are the holes, but I'll get to them later...



Cyclists Dismount

Yes, the signs of failure are everywhere, many of them new, presumably paid for with Velocity money. So cycling money is being spent telling people to get off and walk.



There have always been dismount signs on this route, but they are multiplying, thanks to Velocity funding.



The main excuse for them is the narrow path under the bridges.



But no attempt has been made to widen the path or provide alternatives, and in most cases nothing has been done to repair the poor surfaces under the bridges.



Likewise the cobbled surfaces by the locks have not been repaired, despite being in a dreadful condition.



Lighting

Yes, there has been some attempt to put in lighting - solar powered lights in the path, white, except above some locks



where they are red. However, they are unlikely to provide sufficient lighting to persuade most people to cycle along this route in the dark. Many of these lights are shaded by fences & trees so they won't charge up in the winter when they are most needed.

Only a few of these lights have gone in so far at the Manchester end, the rest of the path is covered in holes.



I know from posts on Twitter that many people have gone back to cycling on the road, because the Ashton Canal path is now really inconvenient for daily commuting. Looks like TfGM and the Canal and River Trust have managed to divert cycling money into upgrading a footpath whilst discouraging people from cycling on it.

Sunday, 5 July 2015

Bridgewater Way 1 - Deansgate to Throstle Nest Bridge - not fit for purpose

This is the first in a series of posts revisiting the newly resurfaced Bridgewater Way. This first one was prompted by Manchester City Council's consultation which refers to this section of canal towpath when in the works here have more or less finished. This is in itself a repeat of a previous consultation by MCC for the same junction over a year ago.



Taking the position of the sculpture Life Cycle by George Wyllie as the start of this route you turn down the quiet part of Deansgate.



Now you have to look very carefully to your right to see the path under the block of flats. One of these parking spaces is planned to be removed to enable access.



From here is the end of the Manchester City Council section and the beginning of the path on Peel Holdings land. There has been some work on this section with textured pavement, though there is no benefit for cycles.



This section under the A56 becomes extremely slippery during the winter, making it very difficult even to walk on, let alone cycle. There has been nothing done to improve matters...



This next section is also slippery during the winter.



Another problem for people cycling will be how busy this area gets during fine summer evenings, particularly here outside the Wharf.



The wooden bridges have all been resurfaced with the addition of narrow anti-slip strips. Again this surface is very helpful for people walking, but will have little benefit when cycling.



As the path turns away from Castlefield Basin the mud and cobbles start. This section  of cobbles is very rough.



This gives way to paving slabs which have been repaired recently. They were in a poor state.



When the cobbles recommence it is clear that there have been some repairs, but they are still horribly rough for an ordinary bike.



These cobbles lead up to the first of the narrow bridges over the wharfs.



On the other side the cobbles are rough and uneven.



At the bridge under the ring road the cobbles give way to brick pavers, which cover the next narrow bridge.



This is certainly a better surface than the cobbles and paving stones, but still not as good as smooth tarmac.



Passing Timber Wharf on the left the next bridge is particularly steep on this side



and not much better on the other side.



At the following bridge under Hulme Hall Road the path narrows horribly.



The path under the bridge is fairly unpleasant.



After a short section of gritted tarmac the next wharf bridge is rough cobbles.



No attempt has been made to improve the surface and there was a lot of glass here.



The surface is uneven on the down side too.



As the path goes under the railway bridges it becomes loose gravel.



The next obstacle is the old bridge under Pomona Strand.



Here the path is dangerously narrow.



Barely wider than bicycle handlebars, and with little headroom it is difficult to get through with an unloaded bicycle. With panniers or a child seat it's pretty dangerous, and far too narrow for tricycles or handcycles.



After that things get a little easier



the old path has been widened a little.



As the path curves, Throstle Nest Bridge comes into view.



The path here is a horribly loose gravel, deep enough to make riding a bike feel unstable.



The loos gravel is gradually being thrown onto the stones forming the edge of the path and into the canal itself.



The feeling of vulnerability on this surface isn't helped by the brambles growing into the path.



As a cycle route this section of path is pretty narrow, and really only suitable for fat tyres.



The final insults are the barriers at the bridge



and another set of rough cobbles.



At least the canal boats get a smooth ride.



As part of Velocity 2025 this route is a waste of money. There are far better routes into the city from here, either crossing Pomona or taking the well surfaced and well lit tow path alongside the River Irwell both of which are easier and far more comfortable.



2.7km